![]() | ||||||
|
![]() |
|
Shaping the Future The Diocese of Southwell and Nottingham A STRATEGIC TEMPLATE FOR MISSION ![]() Introduction At this early stage in seeking to create a more mission shaped diocese the Bishop’s Council and Diocesan Synod, offer the diocesan family a strategic template based on four values, four challenges and four questions. All involved in diocesan leadership are asked to consider and own this template in order to make our diocesan outlook and ministry more mission orientated. “The Kingdom of God is like a mustard seed that someone took and sowed in his field. It is the smallest of all the seeds, but when it is grown it is the greatest of shrubs and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the air come and make nests in its branches” Matt 13 vv. 31 & 32 Jesus used the image of growing plants to illustrate the kingdom of God and the life of the church. St Benedict used the word for trellis to indicate his rule for the community. A trellis or framework supports plants to grow in particular directions. This template is offered as a framework to support the mission and growth of our diocesan family life in sharing the Good News of our Lord Jesus Christ in word and deed. Just as a trellis has gaps so this template provides spaces which need to be filled with mission shoots and branches rooted in our churches and communities. A basic assumption of this document is that God is at work in his world, in other churches, other faiths, other institutions and individuals. We as a diocesan family are called to work together with them, bringing our own understanding of the gospel and our own life as a church. Joining together means we will be collaborative and ecumenical in the working out of these values and our place in God’s mission. We invite leadership bodies at all levels of diocesan life ( parishes, networks, LEPs, clusters, deaneries, departments, chaplaincies, Bishop’s Council, Bishops Staff…..) to use the values, challenges and questions offered in what follows in your own community, cultural and mission context. For example a parish away day might review the life of the parish in the light of the four values; a deanery might use the four challenges to begin thinking about its mission strategy; and a PCC might use the mission questions to plan evangelistic opportunities.
Why Values? It has been said that “you value what you do and you do what you value.” If a structure is changed within our Church, for example a parish or deanery boundary, without changing a key value, then little permanent change takes place. The values people adopt effect their actual behaviour and action. If a church values welcome and hospitality to parishioners who do not normally attend church then change will take place to make the Church environment more hospitable. If this value is not in place then simply changing something structurally will not make a Church community more welcoming. This is only done by focussing on the change of attitudes of the people who are meant to be welcoming. A good test case scenario for altering structures without adopting any rigorous missionary strategy through a values based approach is seen from the Victorian Church. When the 1851 census revealed that only half the population went to Church the response was to build more churches. This structural response did little to alter a decline in church attendance. Rather it gave the institutional church more structural problems (literally!) in terms of buildings. In our own times adopting new expressions of church structurally without first addressing prior questions of context, evangelism, discipleship and appropriate leadership for growing churches (both clergy and lay) is not going to be fully effective. Where fresh expressions of church and network mission flourish these key prior values have already been addressed. It is not the mere adoption of a structure that has brought the added benefit, rather central or core values have been adopted and acted upon. A prayerful values based approach leads to an evolution of structural change in supporting Gospel values and avoiding change for changes sake. The four mission values which have emerged from theological reflection and consultation are: Discerning God Those four Values expanded: 1. By Discerning God we mean amongst other things 2. Valuing People 3. Serving Communities 4. Enabling Change These values will need interpreting according to local cultures, needs and Christian tradition: mission flesh will need to be put on their bare bones. The diagram below is an attempt to place these values in a general cultural and collaborative framework. It highlights the need to resource the diocesan family in theological reflection on mission and in understanding the cultures in which we now live, work and minister. A prior question in strategic thinking is always: “What are the cultures within which we seek to do mission?”
![]() A Mission Statement? The diagram also emphasises the fact that we are called to work together in mission as the one body of Southwell Diocese. “Joining Together in the Mission of God” could be a possible strap line which defines our collaborative intent as part of a diocesan mission statement which includes the above four values: FOUR MISSION CHALLENGES
Every post – a mission rationale FOUR FUTURE MISSION QUESTIONS
What will we do differently? - specifically in mission …. Conclusion Working with this simple triplet of values, challenges and questions a church leadership team has a template through which to identify need and build a mission strategy which is flexible, detailed, and properly resourced. The diocesan family also has a tool which can share mission effectively and collaboratively. The effective use of such a template, backed by diocesan resourcing through the Directors will: Encourage a better understanding of the cultural contexts within which we are called to do mission. A paper prepared by the DCE and the 4 core Directors of Mission, Ministry, Social Responsibility and Education, January 2005 amended in the light of Diocesan Synod debate and further reflection by the Directors, February 2005 |
